Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Results 51 to 57 of 57

Thread: M14s: I may have a pair

  1. #51
    Senior Hostboard Member VolvoHeretic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 8th, 2011
    Location
    The Exact Center of North America
    Posts
    841
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Altec Model 14 Frequency Response Measurements

    Maybe you need to drag those things outside to measure them?

  2. #52
    Senior Hostboard Member
    M14s: I may have a pair


    Alien_Shore's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 25th, 2012
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    731
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    2 Post(s)

    Re: Altec Model 14 Frequency Response Measurements

    Quote Originally Posted by VolvoHeretic View Post
    Maybe you need to drag those things outside to measure them?
    I'm up for trying it, but it just makes me wonder how the recone could impact the FR that significantly? Is it possible there's something wrong with the new VC/recone job? Let me go compare the original NF measurement on the same scale with the recone NF response...
    - Mike

  3. #53
    Senior Hostboard Member
    M14s: I may have a pair


    Alien_Shore's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 25th, 2012
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    731
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    2 Post(s)

    Re: Altec Model 14 Frequency Response Measurements

    I pulled up the before-and-after recone measurements in Holm this morning and did some comparative scrutiny:

    m14woofercompare

    The biggest difference in the parameters of the two measurements was max amplitude (I had the volume turned up much higher for the post-recone measurement)
    - Mike

  4. #54
    Senior Hostboard Member Earl K's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 5th, 2002
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    507
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    4 Post(s)

    Re: Altec Model 14 Frequency Response Measurements

    Hi Mike,

    > What ever happened here ( re; your search for an explanation of old vs new rehabbed woofers, etc. & holes in the mid-range ) ?

    > Did these woofers ever breakin & then even out ( their Freq. response ) ?

    BTW ;

    forums

    > This 22 db vertical scale is a might severe looking ( exaggerating those peaks & dips into things that you won't be able to easily hear ).

    > Try a 50db ( to the vertical scale ) instead. One benefit will be that things just won't look as bad ( as this microscopic like look-see makes it out to be ) .

    Last edited by Earl K; December 4th, 2012 at 08:26 PM.

  5. #55
    Senior Hostboard Member
    M14s: I may have a pair


    Alien_Shore's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 25th, 2012
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    731
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    2 Post(s)

    Re: Altec Model 14 Frequency Response Measurements

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl K View Post
    Hi Mike,

    > What ever happened here ( re; your search for an explanation of old vs new rehabbed woofers, etc. & holes in the mid-range ) ?

    > Did these woofers ever breakin & then even out ( their Freq. response ) ?

    BTW ;
    > This 22 db vertical scale is a might severe looking ( exaggerating those peaks & dips into things that you won't be able to easily hear ).

    > Try a 50db ( to the vertical scale ) instead. One benefit will be that things just won't look as bad ( as this microscopic like look-see makes it out to be ) .

    Thanks for following up, Earl.
    The primary thing I've been doing with my 14s is listening to them
    I'm taking some time off work later this month, and will be working on my numerous Altec projects. I too am quite interested in running some additional FR curves on the 14s now that the woofers have had some time to break in. I will use your advice on the next round of measurements and get them posted up. Another thing I want to do is try the DE250's in them and see if they sound/perform better than the old 902s.
    - Mike

  6. #56
    Junior Hostboard Member Skywave-Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 3rd, 2007
    Posts
    3
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Altec Model 14 Frequency Response Measurements

    If you haven't, try measuring only one speaker, mute the other. You'll get problems with HF cancellation otherwise, unless you are painstakingly precise in your setup. It looks to me like you had both running.

  7. #57
    HB Super Moderator
    M14s: I may have a pair


    Altec Best's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 10th, 2008
    Location
    Central New Jersey
    Posts
    4,190
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    4 Post(s)

    Re: Altec Model 14 Frequency Response Measurements

    Quote Originally Posted by Skywave-Rider View Post
    If you haven't, try measuring only one speaker, mute the other. You'll get problems with HF cancellation otherwise, unless you are painstakingly precise in your setup. It looks to me like you had both running.
    Hey Skywave ! Nice to see you drop by !

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 21135246 times.