Innocent?

[Blazey]

I dont think so..I think he got off again. Being a superstar has its perks eh..first OJ now Michael..What a world we live in.. [img]frown.gif[/img]

[Kassy]

When O.J. was tried...........I watched EVERY F'N SINGLE DAY of the trial...( I had health stuff going on then, and was not working).

I heard ALL the evidence in O.J.'S trial....NEVER missed a day, and had I been juror, I would have found him GUILTY OF 2 MURDERS......

With MIchael Jackson, , i never got to see the actual trial etc.......
But, PEOPLE..."helloooooooooo"........I have seen the interviews where Michael talks about how normal it is, to let a Kid sleep in the same bed as him.
ALSO.......where the fu** were the parents of this "accuser"?
Letting it happen , so they could sue???
I don't rush to judgement,but i can say.......
just GIVEN the Michael interviews, that he , himself conducted..........HE IS GUILTY!!!
Sure he is kinda whacky....ok, HE IS WHACKY,,,,,,,,,hehehe.my point being......he made us see how truly guilty he is/was.
Yes, he was exonerated......doesn't mean he didn't do it!My heart of hearts, he is a pedophile.
My heart of hearts, and watching interviews...he DID abuse McCauley Culkin........
Culkin can say he wasn't "violated"..but he is in fact trying to make a come back in Hollywood.....and doesn't want that stigma attatched.
I could care if peeps agree or disagree on this.....this is just one persons thoughts.....
~peace~

[Kassy]

1 reply.......(me..hehehe)20 something viewed, not responded....
tis ok, but afterall THIS is a messageboard.......
I don't judge peeps here............etc
so far, me and chele ae the only ones who posted.
anyone.......anyone,,,,,,,Bueller??? (G)
peace~**~

<font color="#dbdbda" size="1">[ June 14, 2005 03:58 PM: Message edited by: Kassy ]</font>

[mRs.GaToR]

all I will say is.....i wanna be rich so I can
do illegal stuff and get away with it [img]tongue.gif[/img]

[Blazey]

hahahaha...I love it! [img]tongue.gif[/img]

[The Reverend Dark Angel]

Trials = Celebrity PR

[Blazey]

Well said John! I cant add a thing to that one you took the words right outta my mouth. He will get his one day [img]wink.gif[/img]

[demon chloe]

i think he's guilty... and i think the parent is guilty too.....

life is all about technicalities......


and yes...in time...he too...shall receive...

[*Olivia*]

it all ended up just another 'reality' show on american tv

[JohnUK]

I know I'm several thousand miles away this trial, and all I've seen are the "edited highlights" on news programmes..(although one satellite channel has been producing a "drama" of each day in court - which thankfully I can't receive on my TV!)

But nobody...NOBODY...comes out of this tawdry mess with any respect or credit...

Jackson himself - my gut reaction is he's as gulity as hell. When he was first charged, his "supporters" tried to portray him as someone asexual - not remotely interested in matters of a sexual nature..and yet he had a porn collection...

He's also paid off two previous accusers - an innocent man would prove his innocence in a court of law. To pay someone off suggests that there is a certain amount of evidence of guilt...

Among the evidence NOT allowed in the trial was that he had pictures of other young boys on his computer - that, at least suggests an unhealthy interest...

Then there's the Arviso family - I can't help feeling that they proceeded with the charges only when they didn't get a large enough "offer" from Jackson to keep quiet - and what the HELL were Gavin Arviso's family thinking letting him stay in Neverland and share Jackson's bed????

For that alone, it makes me wonder whether Gavin and his brother would be better off in care - there should be enough doubt in the minds of people about Jackson's history never to allow their sons to be alone in his presence...

Macauley Culkin probably gave the performance of his life when giving evidence - it put him firmly in the spotlight without incurring the stigma of a "victim"...Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand much of his evidence was at odds with the evidence of Jackson's staff who spoke in his defence?

Then there's Martin Bashir and the people who made "that" documentary...There's some questions that need to be asked about the ethics of filming an interview with a man in his 40s holding hands with a 13 year old, with that boy's head resting on his shoulder, and admitting on camera that he shares his bed with him...

If I were Bashir, or anyone else in that room, I would have had to walk away...simply watching it on TV made me feel physically sick - I had to switch channels.

And then there's the jury...Maybe this is a cultural thing, but how on earth can members of the jury be allowed to give interviews on TV afterwards?? Over here in the UK, jury members are kept as anonymously as possible for their own protection as much as anything else - one of the reasons trials are never permitted to be recorded here...

Like I said, maybe it's a cultural thing, but I was amazed the jury were as much "celebrities" as Jackson for a short while...

And then there's the way the media acted/was manipulated - it seemed to me that no opportunity was missed to try and portray Jackson sympathetically...assisted into court by his staff, etc...Just after the jury retired to consider their verdict, we has stories even in the UK that he had been "rushed to hospital" with back pain - but how come there were cameras already waiting for him at the hospital?

Do many people seriously believe that TV companies were able to predict where Jackson would be going when leaving his home? Or is it just possible that they were given a tip-off? If so, by who? Maybe Jackson's staff - designed to elicit sympathy for him - a guy so weak, so ill, so much in pain..couldn't possibly a serial paedophile - right???

One thing is for sure..Jackson will be under the microscope from now on - but if ANY parent allows his or her child to form a "special friendship" with him, they deserve to be locked away as well...