Quote Originally Posted by pvfan View Post
You realize their are athletics other than NCAA Division I right? Not every kid that gets a scholarship can go somewhere else. The coach is at no fault for his/her over evaluation? The kid which in many cases can't afford college without support is kicked to the curb despite having good grades and being a good kid? This is what I hate about NCAA Athletics. People that are just fans could care less about anything other than that what goes in the right hand and left hand column. It's sickening to me.
But thats not what we are talking about. We arent talking about UVa-Wise or Cumberlands, but Alabama and Ole Miss and LSU.

You think a kid who got a scholarship to LSU couldnt get a scholly to McNeese State?

But its okay how athletes use the system tho, right? Like college bball players leaving after one year, football guys leaving after junior season, kids quitting, getting in to trouble, abusing all the perks, taking money from agents and boosters, off the field problems, etc...

And the coach gets punished by losing a scholarship that year. Why should he be punished four years for overestimating a kid? Let's start making transfer kids sit out four years too then. They made a mistake in choosing a school, lets make them wait 4 years before going somewhere else.

At a big time school, I dont see the problem of cutting a kid.

Answer my question;
if a kid gets a football scholarship yet simply cannot cut it on the field, why should he get free board/education/meals/etc... for four years for contributing nothing??
I didnt get four free years of school for being a mediocre athlete, those great kids at Wise who play four years dont get full scholarships, why should a kid who was decent in high school get to get his education for free?