The first one is just completely wrong. The exemption wasn't for a "family owned canning business", not really close. It was for a Starkist tuna company on a pacific island, who's is owned by a company who is based in her district in California. Not a hometown family owned business like it was made out to be. It was proven that she didn't receive any donations or anything from them, their wage is 3.50 something and doubling that for the minimum wage law would hurt that hurt the company and maybe cause them to lay a lot of workers off?
Second one, I would just like to see those bills.
Third one, she is accused of "turning her back" on some members of the party because of her support of some of the Bush bills I mentioned before. They weren't too popular with the Dems and she voted in favor of them, also help blocking the impeachment deal didn't help her too much either.





Bookmarks