<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: raider13</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> What I saw was some guy saying theres terrorist there and even quotes from 50 times more reliable people saying there wasnt. Theres a list written in Arabic saying heres some names of some bombers the Israelis found in Iraq, that could be a Menu from a restraraunt for all I know, I mean seriously. Honestly how the hell do you believe the sites you post on here? 90% of the time when I click on them they make my comp slow as christmas, but retardation does make you slower..makes sense now.
</div></div>
I did, still BS.
Hilarious how Hussein was a threat to us during the Clinton term and how he never was now that Bush has been president since 2001. Also seems funny how Clinton sent troops to a conflict in Yugoslavia that wasn't our business. Meddling in world affairs, the same thing Bush is bashed for.
Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before.
Huh?....And yes Clinton did do that, most presidents do dem or rep...they should all stop IMO. But over 4,OOO troops werent killed in Yugoslavia and didnt put us in 100's of billions in debt. The economy was in the best shape it had been nder Clinton, thats why he's not bashed about Yugoslavia.
The difference is NATO as a whole went into Yugoslavia...and it wasn't dragged out for 5 years...and since when was Saddam a threat in the Clinton years...Clinton just bombed their forces ever so often to keep em in check.
...And if you ain't down with that, I got 2 words for ya....
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: raider13</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Huh?....And yes Clinton did do that, most presidents do dem or rep...they should all stop IMO. But over 4,OOO troops werent killed in Yugoslavia and didnt put us in 100's of billions in debt. The economy was in the best shape it had been nder Clinton, thats why he's not bashed about Yugoslavia. </div></div>
The economy under Clinton was good for 2 reasons - being preceded 8 years by Reagan and the dot com craze. But he bout had it tanked by the end of his second term.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sup-rbeast</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The difference is NATO as a whole went into Yugoslavia...and it wasn't dragged out for 5 years...and since when was Saddam a threat in the Clinton years...Clinton just bombed their forces ever so often to keep em in check. </div></div>
Which brings up the issue of national sovereignty. I personally don't believe we need anyone's approval (NATO, UN, etc) before making a decision.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: boney</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: raider13</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Huh?....And yes Clinton did do that, most presidents do dem or rep...they should all stop IMO. But over 4,OOO troops werent killed in Yugoslavia and didnt put us in 100's of billions in debt. The economy was in the best shape it had been nder Clinton, thats why he's not bashed about Yugoslavia. </div></div>
The economy under Clinton was good for 2 reasons - being preceded 8 years by Reagan and the dot com craze. But he bout had it tanked by the end of his second term.
</div></div>
History at it's finest, you don't wanna talk about Bush the first? We forget so soon. Clinton followed Bush the Worst..I mean first.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: boney</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: raider13</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Huh?....And yes Clinton did do that, most presidents do dem or rep...they should all stop IMO. But over 4,OOO troops werent killed in Yugoslavia and didnt put us in 100's of billions in debt. The economy was in the best shape it had been nder Clinton, thats why he's not bashed about Yugoslavia. </div></div>
The economy under Clinton was good for 2 reasons - being preceded 8 years by Reagan and the dot com craze. But he bout had it tanked by the end of his second term.
</div></div>
lol.
Don't lol too much. The .com craze was huge for the economy. Thats also why it was in the beginning stage of a recession by 98.
"Call me crazy, but I want to buy the Dallas Cowboys end zone and have the star right at the foot of my bed. That way when I score, I can spike the ball right on the star!" -Woody Paige, Around the Horn 10.9.08
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 722</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Don't lol too much. The .com craze was huge for the economy. Thats also why it was in the beginning stage of a recession by 98. </div></div>
He missed part of the page, he was laughing at not knowing who was president before Clinton. [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif[/img]
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks