Just going to add my take...didn't read through everything above very well so sorry if this is a repeat.

Tracey was responding to what had come up in a few posts....really it wasn't a big deal. A couple of people commented that they were surprised he hadn't mentioned it. Maggz expressed her hope that people would not jump to conclusions but as is typical there are people that are not fond of Maggz' style and made some comments. So Tracey was really just clarifying things.

Just my humble opinion...I think Tracey's post was fine. I think it was actually good to clarify for those that might not have realized that the posts might travel around a bit before they end up on the board.

While I think clarifying the timing of things is very helpful, I feel kind of sad if Tracey felt she needed to tell that because people were thinking negatively...but nobody expressed anything negative at least that I saw. Who knows what I didn't see. Nobody was really suggesting anything on that board...just surprise that he didn't say anything which is normal curiousity given he usually does and that we can't really tell the dates things are written. And the thread would have all gone quite normal had Maggz not defended him when he really needed no defending at all since no once was saying anything negative.

*chuckles*...apparantly she needs to stop reading the anti-board.